Teams

Fisher/Roloff

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Carrie Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Cheryl Roloff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Marie Sellke / Kathleen Murrin6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Takumi Koyama / Rie Sasakawa2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-07-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Cassia Carpio / Mary Green-Zwemke1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Michelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2023-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Jing Feng / Katherine Weinfurter6-2, 7-5
2023-07-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Tarynn Berkman / Mary Green-Zwemke6-0, 6-0
2023-06-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Jessica Miller / Leslie Lynch4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Carla Wheeler / Bo Yu7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carrie Fisher
135W–80L career
0%97%3%
3.88
3.5
Cheryl Roloff
42W–107L career
1%99%0%
3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.