Teams

Deux Crew

2024 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
David Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Neville Mehta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results9 ties
2024-08-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Young / Neville Mehta vs Brad Johnson / Garret Glenn6-2, 7-6
2024-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Young / Neville Mehta vs Manny Coria / Calvy Yue7-5, 6-3
2024-07-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Young / Neville Mehta vs Richard Gronostajski / Paul Preston6-1, 6-0
2024-07-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Young / Neville Mehta vs Ryker Autajay / Johan Hong2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Young / Neville Mehta vs Eric Ayers / Patrick Morrissey6-3, 6-4
2024-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Young / Neville Mehta vs Jonathan Hong / Adam Oken2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Young / Neville Mehta vs James Thomas / Kyle Wehner6-3, 6-1
2024-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Young / Neville Mehta vs Will Gruner / John Magaddino0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-07-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNeville Mehta / David Young vs John Rutledge / Simon Yee7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
David Young
22W–14L career
2%95%3%
3.28
3.5
Neville Mehta
113W–80L career
0%99%0%
3.26

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.