Teams

Asian Buff Club

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

1 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Calvey Khim
usually #1 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
Results9 ties
2019-06-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesVinh Nguyen / Calvey Khim vs Ben Kwak / Steven Sparks7-5, 6-1
2019-06-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesVinh Nguyen / Calvey Khim vs Timothy Martin / DaeGoon Lee6-0, 6-1
2019-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesCalvey Khim / Vinh Nguyen vs Mark Durivage / Young Kim7-6, 6-4
2019-05-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesCalvey Khim / Ryan Nguyen vs Frank Parker / Anthony Suralta6-3, 7-6
2019-05-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesCalvey Khim / Vinh Nguyen vs Robert Johnston / Bill Boyett6-0, 6-3
2019-05-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesVinh Nguyen / Calvey Khim vs John Lindberg / Thomas Henderson6-0, 7-5
2019-04-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesCalvey Khim / Vinh Nguyen vs Rick Doussett / Robert Bethke6-3, 6-2
2019-04-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesCalvey Khim / Vinh Nguyen vs John Schlanbusch / Bryan Welch6-1, 6-4
2019-04-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesCalvey Khim / Taylor Flaherty vs Matthew Bartruff / John Reopelle6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Calvey Khim
112W–68L career
28%72%0%
3.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.