N OR-MPRC-Donato

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13

Sarah Morris

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5

4.12

Kerstin Anderson

usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5

4.06

Liz ODonnell

usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

4.06

Pam Edinger

published 4.5

4.04

Michelle Donato

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

3.94

Chiho Cronk

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5

3.88

Kirsten Barnes

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5

3.88

Carrie Fisher

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.85

Janet Tabor

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5

Results6 ties

2024-11-24Won 2–1

W#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Carrie Fisher vs Stacy Hawkins Parker / Jennifer Devoe6-4, 6-1

L#2 DoublesSarah Morris / Janet Tabor vs Amy Leahy / Nicole Griffith6-4, 3-6, 1-0

W#3 DoublesKerstin Anderson / Kirsten Barnes vs Cynthia McPhee / Loann Wong6-4, 6-3

2024-11-23Won 2–1

L#1 DoublesKirsten Barnes / Liz ODonnell vs Patricia Evola / Rebecca Redding6-3, 3-6, 1-0

W#2 DoublesMichelle Donato / Carrie Fisher vs Kimberly Quach / Xia Wu6-7, 7-5, 1-0

W#3 DoublesMary Anderson / Sarah Morris vs Sue Gregoire / Anne McCroskey3-6, 7-5, 1-0

2024-11-17Lost 1–2

L#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Carrie Fisher vs Jennifer Devoe / Stacy Hawkins Parker2-6, 7-6, 1-0

L#2 DoublesKerstin Anderson / Kirsten Barnes vs Cynthia McPhee / Heidi Clark6-4, 3-6, 1-0

W#3 DoublesJanet Tabor / Mary Anderson vs Loann Wong / Laura Luthi6-2, 6-3

2024-10-27Won 2–1

L#1 DoublesChiho Cronk / Sarah Morris vs Monika Dolega-kowalewski / Kirsten Holmes5-7, 6-1, 1-0

W#2 DoublesMary Anderson / Kerstin Anderson vs Minou Chau / Monique Eldridge5-7, 6-3, 1-0

W#3 DoublesMichelle Donato / Carrie Fisher vs Kim Hill / Karen Sullivan3-6, 6-4, 1-0

2024-10-06Lost 1–2

W#1 DoublesMichelle Donato / Carrie Fisher vs Monique Eldridge / Trish Vawter7-5, 6-1

L#2 DoublesKerstin Anderson / Kirsten Barnes vs Kristin Fudalla / Amanda Solomon6-3, 6-1

L#3 DoublesChiho Cronk / Sarah Morris vs Monika Dolega-kowalewski / Kirsten Holmes7-6, 7-5

2024-09-15Won 2–1

L#1 DoublesKirsten Barnes / Liz ODonnell vs Patricia Evola / Sue Gregoire2-6, 6-4, 1-0

W#2 DoublesMary Anderson / Sarah Morris vs Feng Grove / Yuko Hopman6-3, 6-2

W#3 DoublesMichelle Donato / Carrie Fisher vs Cathrine Olander / Kimberly Quach7-5, 3-6, 1-0

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

Sarah Morris

85W–38L career

3%97%0%

4.13

4.5

Kerstin Anderson

112W–85L career

2%98%0%

4.12

4.5

Liz ODonnell

56W–24L career

7%93%0%

4.06

4.5

Pam Edinger

42W–30L career

9%91%0%

4.06

4.5

Michelle Donato

106W–70L career

9%91%0%

4.04

4.5

Chiho Cronk

92W–68L career

30%70%0%

3.94

4.5

Kirsten Barnes

54W–41L career

45%55%0%

3.88

Carrie Fisher

135W–80L career

0%97%3%

3.88

4.5

Janet Tabor

51W–28L career

52%48%0%

3.85

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.