← Teams

LOTC-Conroy

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Leslie Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Benjamin Brewer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Kristi Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Kevin Semonsen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Lavios
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Sarah Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Frank Brown
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Nora Semonsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Paul Best
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-11-23Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesFrederique Lavios / Michael Lavios vs Mike Rebar / Barbara Pasmore1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Paul Best vs David Smiley / Karen Pickering6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Benjamin Brewer vs Karl Kropp / Andrea Kropp6-1, 6-2
2019-11-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesPaul Best / Kristi Vargas vs Alison Davis / Neville Mehta6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesArun Sundaram / Leslie Lynch vs Steve Vanderploeg / Eunhee Heller7-5, 7-5
2019-11-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Kevin Semonsen vs Lia Irvin / Austin Martinez6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKristi Vargas / Paul Best vs Annette Hill / Saril Valiyaparambil6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDouglas Brewer / Nora Semonsen vs Lyudmila Leissler / James Harlan6-1, 7-5
2019-11-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Kevin Semonsen vs Beth Burczak / Robert Crawford1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFrank Brown / Nora Semonsen vs Walt Crate / Sara Crate6-0, 6-3
2019-10-26Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Benjamin Brewer vs Chynh Vo / Karen Dellinger3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Lavios / Frederique Lavios vs Kirk Planck / Carla Wheeler7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesFrank Brown / Kristi Vargas vs Jinquan Wu / William Wang6-1, 6-2
2019-10-12Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesFrank Brown / Kristi Vargas vs Jason Fitzgerald / Debbie Frankel6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCalvin Chen / Sarah Bradley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-10-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / Frank Brown vs Dan Tracy / Carri Schmidt6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFrederique Lavios / Michael Lavios vs Greg Culver / Chrys Culver7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Benjamin Brewer vs Troy Davis / Ronda Atwood6-2, 6-4
2019-09-28Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesPaul Best / Kathleen Budnick vs Crystal Bryant / Christopher Shaw6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFrederique Lavios / Kevin Semonsen vs Paula Morgan / Kelly Woodard6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCalvin Chen / Sarah Bradley vs Jennifer Woodard / Anthony Guzzi6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Leslie Lynch
58W–58L career
0%97%3%
3.86
4
Benjamin Brewer
19W–20L career
2%93%5%
3.81
4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
0%99%1%
3.78
3.5
Kevin Semonsen
48W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Michael Lavios
30W–56L career
2%89%8%
3.33
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Sarah Bradley
25W–43L career · type M
not enough data
—
3
Frank Brown
115W–69L career
0%20%80%
3.21
3
Nora Semonsen
47W–70L career
1%90%9%
2.86
3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%3%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.