Teams

Rice

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Nate Look
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Leo Keppinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.46
Rich Rice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2023-08-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesRich Rice / Leo Keppinger vs Ken Schwerd / Sam Kallevig3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRich Rice / Eric Hickey vs David Mittelstadt / Doug Post6-3, 6-1
2023-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRich Rice / Leo Keppinger vs Jason Mah / Son Huynh6-2, 6-1
2023-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeo Keppinger / Rich Rice vs Vincent Lee / Kevin Heller4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeo Keppinger / Nate Look vs Shane Wilson / Son Huynh7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesRich Rice / Leo Keppinger vs Tony Moreno / Patrick Maginnis7-5, 6-2
2023-07-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesRich Rice / Nate Look vs Radu Tudorache / Alexander Gardner6-4, 6-4
2023-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesRich Rice / Leo Keppinger vs David Pham / Daniel Paul7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nate Look
61W–49L career
0%83%17%
3.97
4.5
Leo Keppinger
58W–34L career
36%64%0%
3.93
4
Rich Rice
65W–70L career
45%55%0%
3.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.