Teams

Mendenhall

2024 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Kayleen Mendenhall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Kristen Benkstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Jessica Khalili
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results7 ties
2024-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKayleen Mendenhall / Molly Murphy vs Mayla Morgan / Allison Fryman6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesMolly Murphy / Jessica Khalili vs Kathleen Budnick / Corinne Strauser6-1, 6-3
2024-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Khalili / Akemi Okusada vs Jennifer Petersen / Tami Oglesby6-4, 6-3
2024-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesKayleen Mendenhall / Kristen Benkstein vs Melissa Light / Susan Gabe6-3, 6-1
2024-07-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Benkstein / Jessica Khalili vs Robby Lafleur / Leslie Lynch6-1, 7-5
2024-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesKayleen Mendenhall / Akemi Okusada vs Kris Kelly-Koster / Emily McBride6-3, 6-1
2024-06-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Benkstein / Jessica Khalili vs Tarynn Berkman / Cassia Carpio5-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kayleen Mendenhall
95W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.84
4
Kristen Benkstein
132W–55L career
0%99%1%
3.83
4
Jessica Khalili
51W–22L career
0%98%2%
3.82

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.