Teams

Harlow

2024 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Karen Harlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Gail Bolte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Cara Williams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2024-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesJing Li / Gail Bolte vs Abby Hata / Britani Kavanaugh6-3, 6-3
2024-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Harlow / Gail Bolte vs Bernice Zhang / Xiaolu Huang4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Harlow / Jing Li vs Jennifer Drew / Kerri Patrick7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2024-07-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCara Williams / Jing Li vs Tina Prassas / Kathy Cook3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Harlow / Jing Li vs Lisa Bledsoe / Laurence Dupray6-1, 6-0
2024-06-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Harlow / Cara Williams vs Jennifer Drew / Kerri Patrick6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Harlow / Gail Bolte vs Abby Hata / Kara Kraft6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Harlow / Jing Li vs Catherine Hu / Jenica Susi4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Karen Harlow
80W–58L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Gail Bolte
93W–77L career
0%99%1%
3.29
3.5
Cara Williams
56W–42L career
3%95%1%
3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.