Teams

Miami-Dade - Coral Pine/Necuze

2022 Miami-Dade Mixed 40 & Over - Fall · 9.0

2 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/FLORIDA / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Werner Vondrak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.81
Miriam Radillo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Results5 ties
2021-12-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichele Drucker / Werner Vondrak vs Leslie Stein / Ricardo Matos Casas6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-11-07Split 11
L#2 DoublesAntonio Necuze / Miriam Radillo vs Kenny Oliver / Laura Herskowitz6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMichele Drucker / Werner Vondrak vs Maria Hulett / Carlos Ramirez6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanine Burke / Werner Vondrak vs Laura Herskowitz / GABRIELE GHINI7-5, 6-2
2021-10-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesAntonio Necuze / Miriam Radillo vs Gricel Boto Bernales / Sean Lowery6-1, 6-1
2021-09-19Split 11
L#2 DoublesMiriam Radillo / Miguel Fundora vs GABRIELE GHINI / Laura Herskowitz6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWerner Vondrak / Michele Drucker vs Arturo Guzman / Barbara Viscito6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Werner Vondrak
156W–152L career
35%65%0%
3.91
4.5
Miriam Radillo
87W–83L career
63%37%0%
3.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.