Teams

N OR-Mathew

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Karina Frid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.66
Sharon Mathew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2023-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Inna Vlad vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesInna Vlad / Karina Frid vs Sara van Beckum / Angie Stromquist6-3, 6-1
2023-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Karina Frid vs Colleen Nolan / Erin Casey6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Inna Vlad vs Tami McAra / Erin Hill6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Karina Frid vs Cate Harrington / Morgan Sugar-BUtter4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesInna Vlad / Karina Frid vs Tina Farrelly / Sarah Carrato6-1, 6-2
2023-06-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesInna Vlad / Karina Frid vs Michele Snyder / Erin Hill6-2, 6-0
2023-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesInna Vlad / Karina Frid vs Leah Buxman / Mary Klinger6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Karina Frid
38W–13L career
7%90%3%
4.15
4
Sharon Mathew
108W–46L career
4%96%0%
3.66

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.