← Teams

MPRC-Hilts

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.43 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Gregg Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Corin Nies
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Dan Wolff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Michelle Dombek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Ann-Marie Lundberg
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Jane Pinkowski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
—
James Prouty
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results8 ties
2018-12-01Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesGregg Palmer / Michelle Dombek vs NANDA SIDDAIAH / Diana Blebea6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTom Clemente / Jane Pinkowski vs Dan Boren / Cheri Martes Davis6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJames Prouty / Vera Vos vs Agus Rusli / Debbie Spitzer6-1, 6-3
2018-11-18Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJane Pinkowski / Gregg Palmer vs Jacqueline Wilcox / Lee Wilcox6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnn-Marie Lundberg / Martin Wells vs Julie Gorecki / Daniel Gorecki7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJames Prouty / Kate Kearney vs Kim Hamlik / Jim Hamlik6-1, 6-4
2018-11-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesTom Clemente / Jane Pinkowski vs Tony Moreno / Jian Xu6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCorin Nies / Rachel Nies vs Vimal Natarajan / Weizhen Guo6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnn-Marie Lundberg / Martin Wells vs Rajan Mehndiratta / Kusum Mehndiratta6-1, 6-4
2018-10-28Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMichelle Dombek / Gregg Palmer vs Gretchen Wagner / Glenn Eisen6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesVera Vos / Dan Wolff vs Elizabeth Burns / Jeffrey Bayless6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnh Pham / James Prouty vs Catherine Leedy / Robert Crawford5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2018-09-30Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesGregg Palmer / Michelle Dombek vs Marco Bas / Naomi Steinberg6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDan Wolff / Vera Vos vs Guy Neal / Jolene Neal6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEdwardeen Hilts / James Prouty vs Ellen Foley / James King6-1, 6-3
2018-09-29Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTom Clemente / Jane Pinkowski vs Rolf Ellingsen / Karen Pickering2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Prouty / Kate Kearney vs Jon Peters / Heidi Kjos6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCorin Nies / Rachel Nies vs David Smiley / Cheryl Geisler6-1, 6-4
2018-09-16Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDan Wolff / Ann-Marie Lundberg vs Marianne Conroy / Benjamin Brewer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJames Prouty / Anh Pham vs Kathleen Budnick / Bruce Baker6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCorin Nies / Rachel Nies vs Douglas Brewer / Sarah Bradley7-5, 7-6
2018-09-09Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dombek / Dan Wolff vs John Kin / Danielle Cuenco6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom Clemente / Jane Pinkowski vs Colleen Walker / Jeff Marshall6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Gregg Palmer
182W–77L career
0%94%6%
3.92
3.5
Corin Nies
14W–17L career · type S
6%91%3%
3.25
3.5
Dan Wolff
25W–51L career
12%88%1%
3.16
3.5
Michelle Dombek
38W–54L career
15%85%0%
3.07
3.5
Ann-Marie Lundberg
63W–71L career
41%59%0%
2.97
3
Jane Pinkowski
42W–43L career
0%91%9%
2.92
3
James Prouty
19W–50L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.