Teams

Mathew-PDX Net Force

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Andrea Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Sharon Mathew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2022-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Andrea Robertson vs Deanna McKay / Kathy Ramsey6-0, 6-0
2022-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Anh Nguyen vs Timothea Barnatan / Helen Chen6-0, 6-4
2022-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Andrea Robertson vs Michelle Posey / Dana Baioni7-5, 6-1
2022-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Andrea Robertson vs Pat Kaplan / Kathy Ottesen6-0, 6-1
2022-07-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnh Nguyen / Andrea Robertson vs Clarice Brown / Tammy Cofield6-2, 6-2
2022-07-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Anh Nguyen vs Deanna McKay / Jennifer Woodard6-2, 6-3
2022-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Anh Nguyen vs Lyann Nguyen / Jian Xu4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Mathew / Andrea Robertson vs Sandi Martes / Jackie Konen6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Andrea Robertson
92W–64L career
2%98%0%
3.69
4
Sharon Mathew
108W–46L career
4%96%0%
3.66

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.