← Teams

MC-Bad Doggies 2-Hinojosa

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

1 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Santosh Lahankar
usually #1 Doubles 72%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
Results25 ties
2022-10-16Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Dan Michalski / Mercedes Renteria IV6-2, 6-2
2022-10-16Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Timothy Booher / Matthew Johnston6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-15Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Gautam Joshi / Vivek Narra6-4, 6-3
2022-10-15Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Tim Nelson / Andrew Swaim6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2022-10-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Arun Gomathinayagam / Ramu Govindasamy6-2, 6-2
2022-10-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesDaniel Wajerski / Santosh Lahankar vs Ken Shimizu / Mark Landau6-4, 6-4
2022-08-28Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Martin von Haartman / WonKyu Kim5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-27Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Mike Shaffer / Jeremy Kasa6-4, 6-0
2022-08-27Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesDaniel Wajerski / Santosh Lahankar vs Christopher Cahoon / Adam Ortega6-1, 6-1
2022-08-26Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Manoj Agnihotri / Seth Yount4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-08-14Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Sachin Sharma / Vibhuti Bhushan6-1, 6-0
2022-08-13Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesDaniel Wajerski / Santosh Lahankar vs Hoon Shin / Nhan Phan6-0, 6-2
2022-08-12Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Jordan Jones / Hugo Sandoval6-0, 6-1
2022-08-12Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Wajerski / Santosh Lahankar vs Anthony Williamson / Nathan Rettke6-0, 6-4
2022-06-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Matt Kempf / Joel Higgins6-2, 6-1
2022-06-05Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs David Halgren / Jerel Navarrete5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-03Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Bruce James / Mike Bursiek7-5, 6-1
2022-05-14Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Sandrio Elim vs Jeffrey Ma / Jonathan Brown6-4, 7-6
2022-05-08Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Sandrio Elim vs Thomas Stave / Ryan Froondozo6-3, 6-2
2022-04-30Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Sandrio Elim vs Tony Balkan / Justin VonGortler4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-04-22Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Sandrio Elim vs Dan Onu / Glynn Omoto7-6, 7-5
2022-04-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Sandrio Elim vs Stefko Kostadinov / Tim Flood6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2022-04-09Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Sandrio Elim vs Darrel Rich / Jeff Mcdowell6-2, 7-5
2022-04-03Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs David Kosloff / Peter Stroble6-1, 7-6
2022-04-01Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesSantosh Lahankar / Daniel Wajerski vs Christopher Cahoon / Adam Ortega3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Santosh Lahankar
73W–35L career
1%98%1%
3.28

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.