Teams

Wilson-Triple Faulters

2025 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Kevin Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Joshua Goddard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Brian Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Shane Wilson
published 4
3.35
Huy Pham
published 3.5
Results6 ties
2025-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesHuy Pham / Joshua Goddard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Hughes / Jason Qian vs De Xiang Novac-Yu / Sanh Trinh6-1, 6-2
2025-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Hughes / Jason Qian vs Tod Johnston / Gregg Palmer7-5, 6-3
2025-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Hughes / Shane Wilson vs Alexander Gardner / Radu Tudorache6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Hughes / Kevin Hughes vs Ken Avenoso / Tod Johnston6-4, 6-2
2025-07-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Hughes / Kevin Hughes vs Tommy Trakoolthai / De Xiang Novac-Yu6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kevin Hughes
102W–53L career
0%94%6%
3.90
4.5
Joshua Goddard
74W–48L career
52%48%0%
3.86
4
Brian Hughes
89W–41L career
0%97%3%
3.83
4
Shane Wilson
15W–13L career
1%97%2%
3.78
3.5
Huy Pham
40W–26L career
0%97%3%
3.35

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.