Teams

Preston/Yount

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Seth Yount
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.00
Paul Preston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-08-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Seth Yount vs Daniel Apsey / Paul OHollaren5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Seth Yount vs STEPHEN BRUGH / Steve Snyder6-4, 6-2
2022-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Seth Yount vs Eric Sowle / Frank Weiss4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-31Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSeth Yount / Paul Preston vs Manoj Agnihotri / Tom Finnerty4-5
2022-07-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Seth Yount vs Jack Dempsey / Joel Naumoff6-1, 6-2
2022-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Seth Yount vs STEPHEN BRUGH / William DelPlato4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Seth Yount vs Keith Westrum / Masafumi Inoue6-3, 6-1
2022-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaul Preston / Seth Yount vs Paul OHollaren / Daniel Apsey6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Seth Yount
178W–58L career
13%87%0%
3.59
3
Paul Preston
31W–41L career
0%76%24%
3.00

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.