Teams

Serve Me a Doubles-Crothers

2021 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kelsey McGinnis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Heather Matteri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Julia Plowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2021-08-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Julia Plowman vs Kayla Casebeer / Jeri Finn6-4, 6-1
2021-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Kelsey McGinnis vs Megan Heyworth / Courtney Laing6-4, 7-6
2021-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Kelsey McGinnis vs Autumn Bunch / Jasmin Brown6-4, 6-2
2021-07-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesJulia Plowman / Sarie Crothers vs Brooke Daniel / Rachel Young6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-07-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Kelsey McGinnis vs Maya Mori / Nina Hanson6-4, 7-6
2021-07-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Heather Matteri vs Lisa Mayer / Amy Thomas6-1, 6-2
2021-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSarie Crothers / Julia Plowman vs Christie Herkert / Hilary Johnson6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Kelsey McGinnis
49W–21L career
1%85%14%
3.40
3.5
Heather Matteri
58W–30L career
0%97%3%
3.34
3.5
Julia Plowman
73W–28L career
6%94%1%
3.20

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.