← Teams

VTC-Savage

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.14 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Brad Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 8% · published 3.5
3.14
Ryan Owens
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.13
ALFREDO ALANIS
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.82
Steven Darling
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.70
Mike Olson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Todd Berinstein
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.34
Wesley Eader
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Ryan Owens vs Tom Finnerty / Christian Paulsen7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Grant / Mike Olson vs Seth Yount / Eric Ayers6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesALFREDO ALANIS / Jean Pierre Belmar vs Yongping Liu / Dan Blaker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-04Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Ryan Owens vs Jason Leong / Dave Sato6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesALFREDO ALANIS vs Steve Elmer6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKevin Grant / Wesley Eader vs Brian Chapler / Lee Anderson3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatt Savage / Steven Darling vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-22Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Ryan Owens vs MICHAEL DOHERTY / Frank Weiss7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesALFREDO ALANIS vs Marshall Levine6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Geisler / Todd Berinstein vs Nathan Ayotte / Nathan Bernhardt2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Grant / Steven Darling vs Ryan Baenen / Brendan Finn6-4, 6-4
2022-05-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesALFREDO ALANIS / Jean Pierre Belmar vs Mark Alan / Scott Naugler6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrew Geisler / Mike Olson vs William Seidl / Omar Martinez6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWesley Eader / Matt Savage vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-08Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesRyan Owens / Brad Johnson vs Robert Hesslink / Jeremy Geschwind6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesALFREDO ALANIS vs Jamil Panni6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSteven Darling / Mike Olson vs Michael McTague / Carlos Silvas7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWesley Eader / Todd Berinstein vs Paul Best / Maarten Schreuder6-0, 6-4
2022-05-01Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesALFREDO ALANIS / Ryan Owens vs Manoj Agnihotri / Seth Yount6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWesley Eader / Todd Berinstein vs Christian Paulsen / Tom Finnerty6-3, 6-3
2022-04-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Ryan Owens vs Ed de la Fuente / Masafumi Inoue6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMike Olson / Andrew Geisler vs Frank Brown / Keith Westrum6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSteven Darling / Todd Berinstein vs Lee Kriebaum / George Scott6-2, 6-2
2022-04-08Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMatt Savage / Brad Johnson vs Scott Quinn / David Prescott3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesALFREDO ALANIS / Ryan Owens vs Dave Sasaki / Jeremy Geschwind6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesWesley Eader / Todd Berinstein vs Carlos Silvas / Paul Preston6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Brad Johnson
196W–102L career
0%87%13%
3.48
3.5
Ryan Owens
113W–77L career
6%94%0%
3.14
3.5
ALFREDO ALANIS
35W–53L career
8%92%0%
3.13
3
Steven Darling
63W–87L career
0%99%1%
2.82
3
Mike Olson
68W–92L career
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Todd Berinstein
18W–44L career
7%93%0%
2.65
2.5
Wesley Eader
55W–103L career · type A
0%79%21%
2.34

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.