Teams

Deems

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Zachary Meloche
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Matt Deems
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2022-08-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Deems / Zachary Meloche vs Andrew Yabusaki / Mitchell Lund6-3, 6-3
2022-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Deems / Zachary Meloche vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Deems / Zachary Meloche vs Jeff Cronn / Chris Bartlo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Deems / Zachary Meloche vs Matt Bolte / Robert Truong6-3, 6-2
2022-07-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesZachary Meloche / Matt Deems vs Jeff Cronn / Michael Genovese6-4, 6-4
2022-06-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Deems / Zachary Meloche vs Adam Oken / Wiley Zhao6-2, 6-4
2022-06-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Deems / Zachary Meloche vs Jeffrey Gates / Benjamin Moore6-3, 6-0
2022-06-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesMatt Deems / Zachary Meloche vs Andrew Yabusaki / Mitchell Lund6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Zachary Meloche
65W–41L career
0%94%5%
3.85
4
Matt Deems
92W–49L career
23%76%1%
3.61

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.