Teams

N OR-Milligan

2024 One Doubles · 2.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Grainne Koeberl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.45
Vanessa Gallant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2024-07-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesVanessa Gallant / Jacqueline Babb Milligan vs Wenping Xue / Ye Gong6-1, 6-2
2024-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesDenise Butchee / Grainne Koeberl vs Sharon Wise / Roxanna Johnson6-2, 6-2
2024-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrainne Koeberl / Denise Butchee vs Wenping Xue / Jing Liu6-3, 6-2
2024-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Babb Milligan / Grainne Koeberl vs Amy Kirschbaum / Marcia Maynes6-0, 6-2
2024-07-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesVanessa Gallant / Grainne Koeberl vs Brenda Elliott / Katherine FitzGibbon6-4, 6-2
2024-06-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Babb Milligan / Vanessa Gallant vs Shila Bhatt / Joyce Swift6-3, 6-1
2024-06-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Babb Milligan / Vanessa Gallant vs Elma Blum / Abby Pace7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Grainne Koeberl
56W–66L career
0%93%7%
2.94
3
Jacqueline Babb Milligan
35W–63L career
6%94%0%
2.69
3
Vanessa Gallant
31W–83L career
48%52%0%
2.45

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.