Teams

Cassin

2019 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Sandi Martes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Susie Garland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Ann Cassin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSandi Martes / Kathleen Murrin vs Heather Selis / Laurie Sykes4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-07-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandi Martes / Ann Cassin vs Sheila Schmidt / Tamara Beecroft6-1, 6-2
2019-07-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Cassin / Susie Garland vs Judi Babcock / Laurence Dupray6-2, 6-2
2019-07-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Garland / Kathleen Murrin vs Joy Meyers / Sara van Beckum7-6, 6-3
2019-06-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Cassin / Sandi Martes vs Heather Selis / Laurie Sykes6-2, 6-1
2019-06-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Cassin / Kathleen Murrin vs Jeanette Thomas / Yoko Moore6-3, 7-5
2019-06-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandi Martes / Susie Garland vs Cathy Cervantez / GERI DADDIO6-1, 6-1
2019-06-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Garland / Kathleen Murrin vs Seona Zimmermann / Kara Gajowskyj3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Sandi Martes
137W–98L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3.5
Susie Garland
37W–56L career
25%75%0%
3.06
3.5
Ann Cassin
45W–69L career
26%74%0%
3.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.