Teams

N OR-Scott

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Jim Mounts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Norman Langston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
George Scott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2023-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesNorman Langston / George Scott vs Tyler Grant / Matt Savage6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesNorman Langston / Jim Mounts vs Dano Ehler / Patrick Koeberl6-1, 6-0
2023-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNorman Langston / Jim Mounts vs Nathan Bernhardt / Claude Bosworth6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJim Mounts / John Short vs Bhaskara Bandi / Frank Ferschweiler6-4, 6-3
2023-07-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNorman Langston / Jim Mounts vs James Jaeger / Joseph Siri6-3, 6-2
2023-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesJim Mounts / George Scott vs Tyler Grant / Kevin Grant7-6, 6-2
2023-07-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Short / George Scott vs Tom Huminski / Charles Leavitt6-4, 6-2
2023-07-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesNorman Langston / Jim Mounts vs James Jaeger / Joseph Siri0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Jim Mounts
59W–65L career
0%96%4%
2.87
3
Norman Langston
28W–53L career
7%92%1%
2.70
3
George Scott
26W–78L career
35%65%0%
2.51

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.