Teams

Larry BIRDS

2024 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Greg Marx
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Chris Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Marx / Chris Simpson vs Alexander Papadopoulos / Daniel White7-6, 6-4
2024-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Marx / Chris Simpson vs Huy Bui / Austin Rice-Stitt6-2, 6-2
2024-08-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Simpson / Greg Marx vs Garret Glenn / Ryan Owens6-3, 7-6
2024-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesGreg Marx / Chris Simpson vs Chase Doudican / Mikhail Gongadze6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-07-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Simpson / Greg Marx vs Joe Malboeuf / Zach Walsh6-1, 6-3
2024-06-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Marx / Chris Simpson vs Huy Pham / Daniel Paul6-3, 6-2
2024-06-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Simpson / Greg Marx vs Sean McKinnie / Cory Heisterkamp6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Marx / Chris Simpson vs Stefano Cavallucci / Adam Rainey3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Greg Marx
14W–20L career
not enough data
3
Chris Simpson
51W–40L career
0%92%8%
2.94

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.