Teams

Fisher

2022 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Carrie Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Cheryl Roloff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Lindsey Kahler / Mary Klinger6-2, 6-3
2022-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Michelle Beilstein / Karen Ohollaren3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Ginny Ehrlich / Melissa Light6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Diana Callaway / Michele Desmarais6-3, 6-3
2022-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Takumi Koyama / Rie Sasakawa6-4, 6-1
2022-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Judith Kobin / Anne Fahlbusch6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-07-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Shannon Roarke / Amy Bucher7-5, 6-0
2022-07-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff vs Tarynn Berkman / Cassia Carpio6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carrie Fisher
135W–80L career
0%97%3%
3.88
3.5
Cheryl Roloff
42W–107L career
1%99%0%
3.25

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.