Teams

Bowie/Traylen

2025 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Tiffany Bowie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Parish Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Teufelin Traylen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results6 ties
2025-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesParish Burns / Teufelin Traylen vs Gail Bolte / Karen Harlow6-4, 6-2
2025-07-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Parish Burns vs Tina Prassas / Kate Elliott6-2, 6-3
2025-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Parish Burns vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Jennifer Stevenson6-4, 7-6
2025-07-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / KEELEY PLOMBON vs Laurence Dupray / Josette Zervic7-6, 6-3
2025-06-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTeufelin Traylen / Tiffany Bowie vs Jessica Becker / Ying-Chieh Chen3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffany Bowie / Parish Burns vs Allison Ko / Jenica Susi6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Tiffany Bowie
95W–68L career
0%94%6%
3.41
3.5
Parish Burns
112W–58L career
0%98%2%
3.36
3.5
Teufelin Traylen
77W–65L career
14%86%0%
3.08

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.