Teams

Pyle/Garris

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Janae Pyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Alison Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Alison Davis vs Katie Jurgenson / Sara Crate6-2, 6-1
2022-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Wright / Alison Davis vs Jing Feng / Jinquan Wu6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Janae Pyle vs Marilyn Sims / Jennifer Noble7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Deb Garris vs Susie Garland / Ann Cassin7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJanae Pyle / Kim Wright vs Maryam Farinola / Xiaolu Huang7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanae Pyle / Deb Garris vs Shannon Chen / Karen Kraus7-5, 7-6
2022-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Davis / Catherine Leedy vs Michelle Ruby / Sheila Schmidt6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Janae Pyle vs Carrie Norris / Jennifer Trank6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Janae Pyle
98W–49L career
0%95%5%
3.39
3.5
Alison Davis
80W–62L career
27%73%1%
3.08
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.