Teams

MAC-Johnson

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 10.0 Mixed

3 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Annie Duong
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.41
Bo Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Christie Post
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Results7 ties
2018-11-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristie Post / Bo Johnson vs Monika Dolega-kowalewski / Andrew Pritchard6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2018-10-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristie Post / Frank Lippy vs Claudia Ciobanu / Sean Eberle6-1, 6-3
2018-10-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesBo Johnson / Amy Juppenlatz Sweet vs Richard Sabo / Megan Sporndli3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2018-10-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristie Post / Andrew Nilsson vs Shannon DeVall / Ke Ounaphom6-4, 6-2
2018-09-28Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBo Johnson / Alicia Hunt vs Yvette Ly / Ian Paik6-1, 6-4
2018-09-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBo Johnson / Mary Jo Kallgren vs Stephen Robertson / Kaitlin Burns6-2, 6-0
2018-09-08Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPaul Reber / Christie Post vs Ke Ounaphom / Shannon DeVall6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Annie Duong
120W–52L career
0%69%31%
4.46
4.5
Bo Johnson
52W–18L career
0%84%16%
4.41
4.5
Christie Post
29W–26L career
9%91%0%
4.04

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.