Teams

You Cannot Be Serious

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Gregg Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Patrick Brewer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Ken Avenoso
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2023-08-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Brewer / Gregg Palmer vs Tom Lux / John Droege7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesKen Avenoso / Patrick Brewer vs Brad Ouderkirk / Ken Nichols6-4, 6-4
2023-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Avenoso / Gregg Palmer vs Shaun Anderson / William Creger6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Avenoso / Patrick Brewer vs Zhitong Chen / Xiaonan Tian5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Avenoso / Gregg Palmer vs Ken Nichols / Marc DeSantis4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatrick Brewer / Gregg Palmer vs Sheng Saechao / Zachary Meloche7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesKen Avenoso / Patrick Brewer vs John Barbieri / Zachary Kinavey6-3, 6-3
2023-06-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesKen Avenoso / Gregg Palmer vs Mark Shih / Zhitong Chen6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Gregg Palmer
182W–77L career
0%94%6%
3.92
4
Patrick Brewer
68W–59L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Ken Avenoso
69W–67L career
4%96%0%
3.66

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.