Teams

SHC-Nguyen/Mayer

2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Ruth Semon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Elizabeth Maguire
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Amy Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results4 ties
2020-03-08Split 11
L#1 DoublesSharon Patricelli / Amy Thomas vs Carrie Norris / Robyn Hilden6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRuth Semon / Elizabeth Maguire vs Barbara Streeter / Devrie Brennan6-3, 6-0
2020-03-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Semon / Sharon Patricelli vs Jennifer Fei / Debbie Spitzer6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2020-02-22Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRuth Semon / Sharon Patricelli vs Brooke Daniel / Melissa Gibson6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Maguire vs Kristen LaBarca6-2, 6-2
2020-02-08Won 20
W#1 DoublesRuth Semon / Elizabeth Maguire vs Teresa Darling / Trish Carder6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmy Thomas / Cricket Forsey vs Mary Jane Toolson / Pamela Lagielski6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Ruth Semon
51W–32L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Elizabeth Maguire
78W–42L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3
Amy Thomas
27W–46L career
1%89%10%
2.87

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.