Teams

Cut-Pham

2019 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Bradley Sumoge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Joshua Goddard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.35
Huy Pham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2019-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesHuy Pham / David Nguyen vs Shane Wilson / Matt Simmering6-1, 6-1
2019-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesHuy Pham / David Nguyen vs Randal Eckerdt / Anthony Valenzuela6-2, 6-2
2019-07-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBradley Sumoge / Joshua Goddard vs Zachary Kinavey / Truc Tran6-4, 6-3
2019-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Goddard / Bradley Sumoge vs Ken Nichols / Soren Coughlin-Glaser6-3, 6-2
2019-07-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Cheng / Huy Pham vs Zachary Kinavey / Truc Tran6-0, 6-0
2019-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Nguyen / Huy Pham vs Rowan Schmidt / Ross Williams6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2019-06-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoshua Goddard / Bradley Sumoge vs Soren Coughlin-Glaser / Terence Gariety6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Bradley Sumoge
83W–48L career
7%93%0%
4.07
4.5
Joshua Goddard
74W–48L career
52%48%0%
3.86
3.5
Huy Pham
40W–26L career
0%97%3%
3.35

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.