Teams

WSC-Strieb

2020 Adult 40 & Over · 5.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Kirsi Varsa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Anne Corsano
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
Results5 ties
2019-11-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Stapp / Anne Corsano vs Joanna Stewart / Allison Porter6-3, 6-3
2019-11-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Corsano / Kirsi Varsa vs Kari Aggerholm / Cara Holloway6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2019-10-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Newby / Kirsi Varsa vs Nancy Daly / Rochelle Whelan6-4, 7-5
2019-10-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKirsi Varsa / Karolina Simons vs Joanna Stewart / Kathryn Osborne6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2019-09-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLindy Irving / Anne Corsano vs Jodie Wise / Kari Aggerholm3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Kirsi Varsa
81W–74L career
0%97%2%
4.26
4.5
Anne Corsano
144W–125L career
21%79%0%
3.98

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.