Teams

Harrigan/Sasakawa

2019 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Kelly Mohr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Flor Harrigan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.36
Rie Sasakawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2019-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Flor Harrigan vs Brandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini6-2, 6-1
2019-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Kelly Mohr vs Julie Hansen / Amy Graham3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-07-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Rie Sasakawa vs Rochelle Hart / Carrie Fisher6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2019-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Rie Sasakawa vs Bin He / Molly Odonnell6-2, 6-1
2019-07-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Kelly Mohr vs Donna Kennish / Andrea Vicino6-3, 6-2
2019-07-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Rie Sasakawa vs Julie Hester / Kristi Vargas6-4, 6-3
2019-06-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Rie Sasakawa vs Donna Feuerherdt / Mary Hlady6-2, 6-2
2019-06-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Rie Sasakawa vs Darci Keljo / Lisa Handley6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kelly Mohr
115W–58L career
8%92%0%
3.61
4
Flor Harrigan
80W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.52
4
Rie Sasakawa
129W–122L career
75%25%0%
3.36

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.