Teams

LOTC-Semonsen

2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristi Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Kevin Semonsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Lavios
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Sarah Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Frank Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Nora Semonsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Paul Best
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Paul Kachel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results7 ties
2020-03-01Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Semonsen / Marianne Conroy vs Kimberly Parks / Michael Arellano6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNora Semonsen / Douglas Brewer vs Debbie Wager / Jason Moore-Greenke6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristi Vargas / Paul Best vs Lauren Larsen / Kevin Lennox6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2020-02-29Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Paul Best vs John Magaddino / Lisa Howlett6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPaul Kachel / Frederique Lavios vs Pat Nevin / Nicolle Lochner7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesFrank Brown / Sarah Bradley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-02-23Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrank Brown / Kristi Vargas vs Julie Gorecki / Daniel Gorecki6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Lavios / Marianne Conroy vs Trylla Lembke / Gary Doyle6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDouglas Brewer / Nora Semonsen vs Lee Wilcox / Jacqueline Wilcox6-1, 6-1
2020-02-01Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Semonsen / Frederique Lavios vs Ryan Manwiller / Theresa Fichter3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNora Semonsen / Paul Kachel vs Deepak Kumar / Christina Bergstrom6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDouglas Brewer / Sarah Bradley vs PHAT Lee / Yu Zhang6-1, 6-3
2020-01-25Lost 12
W#1 DoublesFrederique Lavios / Michael Lavios vs Dayna Porter / Craig Pearson6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Paul Best vs Janet Mills / Doug Birch4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNora Semonsen / John Knudson-Martin vs Norine Nelson Martin / Pete Kovalenko7-6, 6-4
2020-01-10Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Budnick / John Knudson-Martin vs Eric Anderson / Shamera Daugherty6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Bradley / Douglas Brewer vs Mike Baker / Rhonda Baker6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Paul Kachel vs Lillian Lee / Ken Pacioni6-4, 6-3
2020-01-05Split 11
W#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / Frank Brown vs Blythe Knott / Andy Murray4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Bradley / Douglas Brewer vs Lori Vranizan / Randy Boose6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
0%99%1%
3.78
3.5
Kevin Semonsen
48W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Michael Lavios
30W–56L career
2%89%8%
3.33
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Sarah Bradley
25W–43L career · type M
not enough data
3
Frank Brown
115W–69L career
0%20%80%
3.21
3
Nora Semonsen
47W–70L career
1%90%9%
2.86
3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%3%
2.86
3
Paul Kachel
19W–29L career
7%87%6%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.