Teams

Crate/Jurgenson

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Sara Crate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Katie Jurgenson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2022-08-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Jurgenson / Sara Crate vs Catherine Leedy / Alison Davis6-2, 6-1
2022-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Jurgenson / Sara Crate vs Ann Skoog / Michelle Coleman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Crate / Katie Jurgenson vs Jing Feng / Jinquan Wu7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesSara Crate / Katie Jurgenson vs Michelle Ruby / Sheila Schmidt6-3, 6-0
2022-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Crate / Katie Jurgenson vs Jennifer Trank / Carrie Norris7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Jurgenson / Sara Crate vs Shannon Chen / Karen Kraus6-4, 7-6
2022-07-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesSara Crate / Katie Jurgenson vs Ann Cassin / Susie Garland6-0, 7-6
2022-07-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Crate / Katie Jurgenson vs Anita Rockwell / Vivian Nguyen6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Sara Crate
92W–86L career
0%88%12%
3.47
3.5
Katie Jurgenson
84W–60L career
0%95%5%
3.40

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.