Teams

Double the Fun v3.5-He

2019 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.22
Bin He
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-07-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBin He / Laura Rundle vs Michele Desmarais / Kazzie Young6-2, 6-3
2019-07-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesBin He / Laura Rundle vs Dana Baioni / Kathleen Cooney6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2019-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Rundle / Theresa Berry vs Anita Rockwell / Crystal Miller7-6, 6-3
2019-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesBin He / Laura Rundle vs Julia Hall / Katy Marcy2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-06-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Rundle / Theresa Berry vs Shannon Berry / Tina Chong7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2019-06-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBin He / Theresa Berry vs Loo Yah Leong / Robby Lafleur7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2019-06-21Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBin He / Laura Rundle vs Sibyl Jarrett / Gretchen Hall1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-06-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesBin He / Laura Rundle vs Sandra Ellis / Jeny Joseph6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
25%75%0%
3.53
3.5
Bin He
68W–63L career
7%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.