Teams

Moreno-You Got Served

2022 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Leo Keppinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.68
Tony Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Igor Landais
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results7 ties
2022-08-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIgor Landais / Leo Keppinger vs Agus Rusli / David Vant Hof6-1, 6-2
2022-07-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesIgor Landais / Tony Moreno vs Jeffrey Gates / Michael Rollyson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeo Keppinger / Tony Moreno vs Brian Hughes / Bradley Sumoge6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesIgor Landais / Tony Moreno vs Aj Messer / Nikhil Parulkar6-2, 6-0
2022-06-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeo Keppinger / Tony Moreno vs David Pham / Patrick Maginnis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesIgor Landais / Leo Keppinger vs Justin Shull / Lorne Bulling6-4, 7-5
2022-06-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeo Keppinger / Tony Moreno vs Chris Eddy / William Anderson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Leo Keppinger
58W–34L career
36%64%0%
3.93
4
Tony Moreno
309W–153L career
2%98%0%
3.68
4
Igor Landais
62W–55L career
3%97%0%
3.67

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.