Teams

Lobs of Fun

2024 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Karen Dellinger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Kelly Mohr
published 4
3.52
Flor Harrigan
published 4
3.36
Rie Sasakawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results7 ties
2024-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesRie Sasakawa / Kelly Mohr vs Cindy Rushall / Samantha Williams7-5, 6-1
2024-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRie Sasakawa / Flor Harrigan vs Erin Casey / Colleen Nolan6-2, 6-4
2024-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesFlor Harrigan / Karen Dellinger vs Danielle Cuenco / May Albano7-5, 6-4
2024-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Dellinger / Rie Sasakawa vs Cindy Rushall / Samantha Williams6-3, 7-5
2024-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Mohr / Rie Sasakawa vs Kristen Kopack / Carrie Putsch4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Dellinger / Kelly Mohr vs Inna Vlad / Karina Frid7-6, 6-1
2024-06-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Dellinger / Flor Harrigan vs Crystal Bryant / Michele Snyder6-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Karen Dellinger
141W–68L career
1%99%0%
3.74
4
Kelly Mohr
115W–58L career
8%92%0%
3.61
4
Flor Harrigan
80W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.52
4
Rie Sasakawa
129W–122L career
75%25%0%
3.36

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.