Teams

Cassin

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Susie Garland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Ann Cassin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.70
Diana Blebea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Garland / Andrea Vicino vs Sheila Schmidt / Michelle Ruby7-6, 6-0
2022-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Cassin / Diana Blebea vs Jennifer Trank / Carrie Norris6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusie Garland / Ann Cassin vs Catherine Leedy / Deb Garris7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Blebea / Andrea Vicino vs Jing Feng / Jinquan Wu6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesDiana Blebea / Andrea Vicino vs Karen Kraus / Elise D Harvey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnn Cassin / Susie Garland vs Sara Crate / Katie Jurgenson6-0, 7-6
2022-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Vicino / Ann Cassin vs Xiaolu Huang / Vivian Nguyen6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Cassin / Susie Garland vs Devrie Brennan / Jennifer Noble6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Susie Garland
37W–56L career
25%75%0%
3.06
3.5
Ann Cassin
45W–69L career
26%74%0%
3.04
3
Diana Blebea
90W–67L career
3%97%0%
2.70

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.