← Teams

Patriots WKDY

Winter Adult 40 & Over WeekDAY · Womens 4.5

1 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/TEXAS / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Jennifer Benedict
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
Results8 ties
2023-03-07Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Cherie Hall vs Julie Petrucelli / Christina Vogdes4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-03-03Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Michele Rockelein vs Lisa Lawrence / Keli Bigon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-28Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Matilda O'Connor vs Elizabeth Davis / Muriel Tin6-0, 6-3
2023-02-21Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Michele Rockelein vs Julie Dolezal / Brooke Haddox6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-20Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Ashley Ingle vs Catalina Randall / Meagan Didlake6-4, 6-0
2023-02-15Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesMichele Rockelein / Jennifer Benedict vs Kendra Echols / Tiffany Esquivel5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-17Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Barbara Knaggs vs Amber Jordan / Julie Petrucelli7-6, 7-6
2023-01-10Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Benedict / Marla Gostisha vs Shara Hughes / Susan Pyle6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Jennifer Benedict
89W–51L career
6%94%0%
4.08

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.