Teams

Edwards

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Heather Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Tracey Forrest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.43
Susan Sienko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2023-08-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Sienko / Heidi Cronn vs Penny Luong / Aera Seo6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Cronn / Susan Sienko vs Tina Nelson / Christy Wilson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Cronn / Heather Edwards vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Dory Simons6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesHeidi Cronn / Heather Edwards vs Grayson Dempsey / Linda Falvey6-4, 6-3
2023-06-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTracey Forrest / Heather Edwards vs Kara Kraft / Erin Keyser6-0, 6-3
2023-06-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracey Forrest / Susan Sienko vs Christy Wilson / Tina Nelson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-06-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Cronn / Heather Edwards vs Janet Ha / Jinmi Kemple6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heather Edwards
95W–67L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Tracey Forrest
16W–14L career · type A
47%53%0%
2.95
3
Susan Sienko
28W–77L career · type A
52%48%0%
2.43

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.