Teams

Marshburn/Fruits

2019 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

1 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Jean Zuber Marshburn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-07-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Laura Walker / Dorothy Cofield6-3, 6-1
2019-07-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Amy Cooney / Melissa Gibson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-07-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs America Hopson / Sarah Robertson6-2, 6-2
2019-07-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesMeegan Fruits / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Tina Nelson / Christy Wilson6-4, 6-2
2019-07-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Anh Nguyen / Carissa Raleigh7-5, 6-0
2019-07-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Megan Heyworth / Andrea Lamprecht6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2019-06-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMeegan Fruits / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Erin Casey / Hilary Johnson6-2, 6-2
2019-06-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Kelly Norling / Jennifer Raze6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jean Zuber Marshburn
83W–65L career
6%94%0%
3.16

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.