← Teams

WHRC-Collie

2019 Mixed 40 & Over · 9.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 4.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Frank Collie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.19
Cathrine Olander
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.17
Yuko Hopman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Kerstin Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Kirsten Ruchaber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.10
Nathan Austin
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
3.91
Kimberly Quach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Rebecca Redding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.85
Deanna Lautenbach
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Results8 ties
2019-03-10Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKirsten Ruchaber / Toby Krauel vs Christy Grisham / Colt Tipton6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesYuko Hopman / Chris Fahlbusch vs Tonya Dirk / Dyllan Fitzgerald6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNathan Austin / Kerstin Anderson vs Brian Board / Jill Casale6-2, 7-6
2019-03-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesFrank Collie / Kerstin Anderson vs Amy Leahy / Brian Leahy6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChris Fahlbusch / Kirsten Ruchaber vs Bryan Ward / Mary Jo Kallgren6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNathan Austin / Cathrine Olander vs Damon Ogden / Annie Duong6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2019-03-02Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJoe Warner / Cathrine Olander vs Ry Koteen / Tracy Bardell4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Redding / Chris Fahlbusch vs Brian Quisling / Kelcey Brown6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFrank Collie / Deanna Lautenbach vs Brian Hendrickson / Donna Roisom6-1, 6-2
2019-03-02Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJoe Warner / Deanna Lautenbach vs Pamela Buckley / Brent Waddle6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Fahlbusch / Yuko Hopman vs Kelly Sharkey / Jeff Berman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2019-03-01Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNathan Austin / Kimberly Quach vs Ke Ounaphom / June Wu6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Chris Fahlbusch vs Shannon DeVall / Bruce Herkamp4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-02-24Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKeisuke Komine / Rebecca Redding vs Julian Evola / Sydney Taggart5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFrank Collie / Kerstin Anderson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-02-01Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesNathan Austin / Kimberly Quach vs Steve Bidwell / Janine Paulson6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesToby Krauel / Cathrine Olander vs Claudia Ciobanu / Jaap Sparrius6-4, 6-3
2019-01-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJoe Warner / Kimberly Quach vs Theresa Mullally / Josh Schweitz6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesFrank Collie / Kerstin Anderson vs Tonya Dirk / Dyllan Fitzgerald6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Chris Fahlbusch vs Jack Yothers / Mai Hey6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Frank Collie
144W–54L career
0%99%1%
4.21
4.5
Cathrine Olander
80W–65L career
2%97%1%
4.19
4.5
Yuko Hopman
116W–79L career
1%99%0%
4.17
4.5
Kerstin Anderson
112W–85L career
2%98%0%
4.12
4.5
Kirsten Ruchaber
55W–37L career
4%96%0%
4.11
4.5
Nathan Austin
67W–78L career
3%96%0%
4.10
4.5
Kimberly Quach
110W–96L career
36%64%0%
3.91
4.5
Rebecca Redding
97W–95L career
54%46%0%
3.85
4.5
Deanna Lautenbach
55W–83L career
55%45%0%
3.85
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.