← Teams

SHC-Blankenmeister/Forsey

2019 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.07 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Paul Blankenmeister
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Scott Mayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Thomas MacDonald
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Sharon Place
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.61
William Place
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Gina Mandel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Larry Butrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Scott Mandel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Results9 ties
2019-06-09Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesWilliam Place / Cricket Forsey vs Charles Martin / Holly Martin6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGina Mandel / Scott Mandel vs Linda Martz / Jon Martz6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas MacDonald / Denise Angel vs Sue Johnson / Doug Baer6-2, 6-1
2019-06-02Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Lisa Mayer vs Juliana Jiang / John Slominski6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDenise Angel / Thomas MacDonald vs Allison Bader / Eli Lamb6-2, 6-0
2019-05-18Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesPaul Blankenmeister / Linda Blankenmeister vs Cecilia Nguyen / Jim Collins6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Place / Sharon Place vs Raquel Rich / Jim Larkins6-0, 6-0
2019-05-11Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Lisa Mayer vs Ian Rogers / Caitlin Seabright6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaul Blankenmeister / Linda Blankenmeister vs Laney Kibel / Alex Schafir6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLarry Butrick / Cricket Forsey vs Irene Gilbertson / John Lynch6-2, 6-2
2019-05-05Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Lisa Mayer vs James Carey / Claire C Gates7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWilliam Place / Sharon Place vs Iulian Rafai / Meg Anderson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas MacDonald / Denise Angel vs William Maddox / Marianne ODoherty6-2, 6-0
2019-04-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesScott Mayer / Lisa Mayer vs Lee Wilcox / Robin Burak6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLarry Butrick / Linda Blankenmeister vs Ronald Huggins / Mary Jane Toolson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-04-20Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesPaul Blankenmeister / Linda Blankenmeister vs James Lawrence / Kay Hallmark6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLarry Butrick / Cricket Forsey vs Frank Brown / Gail Toft-Vizzini6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2019-04-13Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesSharon Place / William Place vs Jennifer Thompson / Ashok Nedungadi6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesScott Mandel / Gina Mandel vs Karen Lobb-Fouts / Ken Leibowitz6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2019-04-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPaul Blankenmeister / Sharon Place vs Corrine Sorge / Gregory Sorge6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Blankenmeister / Larry Butrick vs Tina Nelson / David Terry6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesScott Mandel / Gina Mandel vs Carolyn Adatto / Darrell Bennett6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Paul Blankenmeister
33W–21L career · type S
7%92%0%
3.17
3
Scott Mayer
70W–71L career · type A
0%55%45%
3.09
3
Thomas MacDonald
54W–33L career
0%59%41%
3.08
3
Sharon Place
38W–30L career
6%91%3%
2.75
3
William Place
31W–50L career
14%86%0%
2.61
3
Gina Mandel
21W–32L career
30%70%1%
2.56
3
Larry Butrick
47W–55L career
37%63%0%
2.50
0
Scott Mandel
21W–17L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.