Teams

Fanelli/Saida

2023 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Benjamin Doan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Issei Saida
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Results7 ties
2023-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Fanelli / Issei Saida vs Todd Klindt / Joe Brooks6-1, 6-2
2023-08-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Fanelli / Benjamin Doan vs Brendan Cunningham / Ramsey Selbak7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-07-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Fanelli / Issei Saida vs Eric Lee / Matt Simmering7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Fanelli / Issei Saida vs Ian Fudalla / Renato Bernasconi Zuccari6-1, 6-1
2023-07-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Fanelli / Benjamin Doan vs Andrew Nilsson / David Squire7-5, 6-3
2023-06-27Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Doan / Matt Fanelli vs Jordan Burns / Toby Krauel6-4, 6-4
2023-06-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMatt Fanelli / Issei Saida vs Thomas McGirk / Elijah Nelson6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Benjamin Doan
9W–18L career
26%74%0%
3.99
4.5
Issei Saida
8W–22L career
34%66%0%
3.93

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.