← Teams

MAC-Bennett/Miller

2019 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
John Popplewell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.26
Tim Leatherman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2019-05-16Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesTim Leatherman / Peter Richter vs Floyd Grant / Peter Monsantofils6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2019-05-03Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJohn Popplewell / Tim Leatherman vs Terence Gariety / Philip Rothrock6-3, 6-3
2019-05-02Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTim Leatherman / Tim Ramis vs Terence Gariety / Roger North6-4, 6-2
2019-04-26Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJames Piro / John Popplewell vs John la Plante / Jeffrey Condit7-5, 7-6
2019-04-19Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesJames Piro / John Popplewell vs Peter Monsantofils / Daniel Beebe6-4, 6-3
2019-04-10Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJohn Popplewell / Peter Mersereau vs Roger North / Steven Boeh7-6, 7-5
2019-03-28Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJohn Popplewell / Harold Rohrbach vs Mike Weedall / Gordon Osaka6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTim Leatherman / Alan Shiffer vs Steven Boeh / Michael Mitchell6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
John Popplewell
52W–26L career
13%84%3%
3.69
3.5
Tim Leatherman
52W–36L career
3%95%2%
3.26

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.