Teams

CP-Gibson

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 5.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Susie Heimdahl
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 5
3.88
Kirsten Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Results6 ties
2018-12-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesBeth Lehman-Brooks / Susie Heimdahl vs Rebecca Stapp / Tracey Hsia6-3, 6-2
2018-11-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristin Gibson / Susie Heimdahl vs Marne Darrall / Jennifer Weller6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2018-10-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKirsten Barnes / Susie Heimdahl vs Megan Bassetti / Amy Holmes7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2018-10-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristin Gibson / Kirsten Barnes vs Maureen Strieb / Lisa Brougham6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2018-09-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTonia van Staveren / Susie Heimdahl vs Nancy Daly / Ann Whitney2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2018-09-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Lehman-Brooks / Susie Heimdahl vs Andrea Olson / Allison Porter6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Susie Heimdahl
62W–62L career
not enough data
4.5
Kirsten Barnes
54W–41L career
45%55%0%
3.88

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.