Teams

WH CunnAustinBak

2024 One Doubles · 4.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 4.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Nathan Austin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Brendan Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Results8 ties
2024-08-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesRamsey Selbak / Brendan Cunningham vs Vu Bui / Ariel Gomez6-2, 6-2
2024-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNathan Austin / Brendan Cunningham vs Daniel Burns / Toby Krauel6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrendan Cunningham / Nathan Austin vs David Squire / Jimmy Crumpacker7-6, 6-1
2024-08-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Austin / Ramsey Selbak vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrendan Cunningham / Nathan Austin vs Matt Fanelli / Austin Cano6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrendan Cunningham / Nathan Austin vs Andy Stecher / Elijah Nelson6-3, 6-4
2024-07-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesNathan Austin / Ramsey Selbak vs Shaun Wilson / Young Vo6-4, 6-2
2024-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesRamsey Selbak / Brendan Cunningham vs Ryley Schultz / Andrew Slominski7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Nathan Austin
67W–78L career
3%96%0%
4.10
4.5
Brendan Cunningham
53W–46L career
10%90%0%
4.06

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.