Teams

Winged M

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Ken Schwerd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Scott Lenker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Christian Casebeer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results7 ties
2023-08-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristian Casebeer / Sam Kallevig vs David Pham / Daniel Paul5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Schwerd / Sam Kallevig vs Rich Rice / Leo Keppinger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKen Schwerd / Christian Casebeer vs Patrick Herbst / Doug Post6-3, 7-6
2023-08-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristian Casebeer / Ken Schwerd vs Son Huynh / Jason Mah6-1, 6-3
2023-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristian Casebeer / Ken Schwerd vs Patrick Maginnis / Tony Moreno6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristian Casebeer / Sam Kallevig vs Alexander Gardner / Nico Jacob-Wendler6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-25Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott Lenker / Ken Schwerd vs Tony Moreno / Alex Rand1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Ken Schwerd
66W–26L career
0%78%22%
4.02
4
Scott Lenker
46W–24L career
1%97%2%
3.80
4
Christian Casebeer
36W–57L career
16%83%1%
3.64

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.