← Search

David Neese

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
PAPILLION, NE
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 157W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history226 matches
W
2026-10-23 · Bourland · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Schmaderer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-10-20 · Kephart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adeeb Adam
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-2
W
2026-10-16 · Bourland · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Schmaderer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-29 · Kephart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eamon Adamson
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-18 · Bourland · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beth Korsos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-09-15 · Kephart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adeeb Adam
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · NE/Betts/40&Over4.5M · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Johnson championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-29 · NE/Betts/40&Over4.5M · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Johnson championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Kephart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eamon Adamson
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · M. Johnson · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renee Marie Acena mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · M. Johnson · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kim Miksich mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · M. Johnson · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renee Marie Acena mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams92 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.2% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
74.5%
41W–14L · 58.2% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
84.6%
22W–4L · 65.7% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
50W–20L · 60.5% of games
9.0mixed
64.2%
43W–24L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
110 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
47 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer