← Search

Lorrie Beckley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Minneapolis, MN
3.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
28 matches · 17W–11L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history28 matches
W
2026-08-16 · 65+ 8.0 Agre · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Alschlager
loading the estimate
7-6
L
2026-08-02 · 65+ 8.0 Agre · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Alschlager
loading the estimate
1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Stedman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Alschlager
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · Stedman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Alschlager
loading the estimate
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-26 · Stedman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Alschlager
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-12 · Stedman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jane Alschlager
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · Stedman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Stedman
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-07-18 · Stedman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Alschlager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2022-07-07 · Stedman-Mcroberts · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cheryl Viera
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2022-06-27 · Stedman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Alschlager
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-6
L
2022-06-13 · Stedman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheryl McRoberts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 5-7, 0-1
W
2022-06-09 · Stedman-Mcroberts · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Newhall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.9% of games
8.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams