← Search

Amy Buege

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Oshkosh, WI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 42W–28L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-22 · WI Adult Mixed 18 &Over 8.0 NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chad Patch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-22 · WI Adult Mixed 18 &Over 8.0 NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Petrinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women NEL OgdenYMCA Romberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Maher championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women NEL OgdenYMCA Romberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Sawall
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-16 · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women NEL OgdenYMCA Romberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Naslund
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · WI Adult Mixed 18 &Over 8.0 NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeffrey Saeger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · WI Adult Mixed 18 &Over 8.0 NEL OshkoshNHS Hammond · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Petrinski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women NEL OgdenYMCA Romberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Maher
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · WI Tri-Level Low Women NEL Western Mileski · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Sawall
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · WI Tri-Level Low Women NEL Western Mileski · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Sawall
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · WI Tri-Level Low Women NEL Western Mileski · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Sawall
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-01-24 · 2025 WI Combo 7.5X NEL Oshkosh Hammond · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chisim Metternich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
55.9%
19W–15L · 51.8% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 67.7% of games
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.4% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer